Wednesday, November 30, 2022
HomeCyclingIgnore false claims and dangerous journalism – most LTNs do scale back...

Ignore false claims and dangerous journalism – most LTNs do scale back visitors | Andrew Gilligan

I’m beginning to marvel if anybody is ever going to make an trustworthy argument in opposition to biking and strolling infrastructure once more. They do exist. Folks used to say issues like “I wish to drive and park wherever I like”, or “why ought to cyclists and pedestrians inconvenience my rather more necessary automotive journey?”.

These are nonetheless the essential objections, however today most distinguished opponents realise that it sounds a bit politically incorrect. You want some greater public curiosity floor, nevertheless shaky, to pitch your tent on.

With low-traffic neighbourhoods (LTNs), which use motor visitors restrictions to spice up strolling and biking, the best choice was once claiming that they improve air pollution. However that has now been so completely debunked that it’s dropping its magic.

So a brand new variant appeared just lately within the Occasions, claiming that “councils that carried out LTNs in the course of the pandemic have seen larger will increase in automotive use than boroughs that didn’t”.

This was primarily based on including up the whole improve in visitors returning after Covid throughout “10 interior London boroughs that launched LTNs in 2020” (11.4%) and evaluating it with the whole improve in “two interior London boroughs that didn’t implement LTNs in 2020” (8.9%).

In a frontrunner, the paper cited its “investigation” as proof that LTNs have been an “costly and infuriating failure”.

The 2 interior boroughs that didn’t introduce new LTNs have been Westminster and Kensington. There’s a totally apparent motive, nothing to do with LTNs, for why visitors return has been much less in these two. They’re central.

Within the working-from-home period, central London’s office-based financial system and visitors hasn’t recovered as a lot as elsewhere. The Occasions didn’t point out this. It didn’t even title the 2 boroughs, maybe to cease readers working it out for themselves.

Take a look at every borough, quite than including small numbers of them selectively collectively, and the “investigation” appears much more problematic. The bottom rise in visitors in London post-Covid (4%) was in Newham, which carried out 5 new LTNs. The second lowest (7.7%) was in that paragon of biking, stuffed filled with LTNs, Waltham Forest.

Against this, the third highest rise in visitors (14.4%) was in Bromley, which created no LTNs. The best of all (16.1%) was in Harrow, the place a handful have been put in however shortly eliminated. May this be why the paper neglected all these – and, certainly, 20 of the 32 boroughs?

There’s good information that the majority, although not all, LTNs do scale back visitors – each inside the scheme space and, after a lag, on the roads instantly round it, as a result of fewer individuals make quick native journeys by automotive.

And as you received’t have learn within the Occasions, throughout London the common rise in visitors post-pandemic was in actual fact precisely the identical in boroughs that put in and stored LTNs because it was in boroughs which by no means did them, or ended them shortly, at 11.1%.

Such borough-wide information is of restricted use anyway – most schemes have been performed on too small a scale to have impacts throughout the entire. Saying all that, although, would have broken the declare the Occasions was making an attempt to push.

The antis’ different favorite pseudo public curiosity argument can also be beneath pressure. To argue, as some do, that biking is a middle-class conspiracy in opposition to the poor, it’s a must to ignore that poor individuals are much less more likely to drive – and that biking is affordable.

However poor individuals (and, in fact, many different individuals) do use buses. Aha! Nice! We will declare bike lanes delay buses! Or we will declare, within the phrases of the long-term anti-bike infrastructure campaigner Vincent Stops, that “the cycle foyer has been allowed to spoil London’s bus service” and that segregated bike tracks have “swung a wrecking ball at bus journey instances”.

The article cites no proof, once more maybe as a result of the proof says one thing fairly totally different.

Taking the newest three months of 2022, common bus speeds in Westminster and Camden – the boroughs with the best quantity of segregated bike lane – are exactly the identical now as they have been in the identical durations of 2013, earlier than development on the lanes began.

If that’s a wrecking ball, I’d be asking my demolition contractor for a refund. The declare that 12 miles of segregated superhighway can have “ruined” a bus community working on virtually 2,000 miles of highway is clearly flawed, too.

The article will get one factor proper: total common bus speeds throughout London have certainly fallen. However right here’s what it leaves out. That decline is essentially as a consequence of enormous drops in outer boroughs with no significant bike infrastructure in any respect. Bromley and Havering, as an illustration, have seen bus speeds fall by as much as 6.3% since 2013.

As I discussed, visitors in central London continues to be not all the way in which again to pre-Covid ranges. Speeds did drop within the centre after 2013, earlier than recovering. However even on a pre-pandemic comparability (between 2013 and 2019), bus speeds fell extra sharply in outer boroughs than in central ones. So may it maybe be that buses are delayed not by bike lanes however by the expansion in motorised visitors?

It is rather telling that opponents so usually need to mislead to make their case. However that doesn’t imply it’s not efficient. And if left unchallenged, it may possibly enter the political bloodstream.

So what lively journey now wants is a community of individuals to scrutinise, swiftly unpick and publicly rebut false claims and dangerous journalism – and to complain to the offenders, who are typically the identical few individuals. That has been quite efficient in decreasing propaganda campaigns on different topics, and making information shops assume twice earlier than publishing slanted tales. How about it, people?

Andrew Gilligan was London’s biking commissioner from 2013-16, and was a transport adviser to Boris Johnson in Downing Avenue.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments

error: Content is protected !!